Am Sonntag 30 M�rz 2003 15:06 schrieb Gabor Hojtsy:
> >>>opinions?
> >>
> >>I don't think that cluttering is a problem in this case. But XML files
> >>need to have a root tag, so parameter-notext.xml should have a root
> >>element (<para> probably)...
> >
> > My mail sounds a little dumb and I know a root tag is mandatory;-)
> >
> :)
> :
> > But, I did a bit testing and 'make test' (and also validating with
> > xmllint) works fine and the generated output looks fine and correct, I
> > expected some validation errors, but none raised. Any clue why?
>
> If you run xmllint on the parameter XML file alone, it will surely say,
> it is faulty... Maybe it does not check the files individually, but all
> combined...

Yes, standalone this file cant be valid ;-)
Can you think of further problems if no root tag is included (xslt-processing 
or whatever else?) Bexause incluning para or simpara will clutter the output.

> >>We need to have a naming convention, so the additional files can be
> >>identified by their names...
> >
> > For parameters I suggest parameter-name_of_parameter.xml, like this one
> > parameter-notext.xml.

BTW.: what about the first hungarian php conference? Did you well?

Friedhelm


--
PHP Documentation Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to