Hello, I need your oppinion about the way how commits will work in the web interface to translate the manual.
There was an idea to solve the problem of being always changing CVS dir with the user's information. The solution would be to have just a CVS account (that hot solution) and all commits would be done by the admin of the project. I'll explain: A translator would translate a file. Then, that file would be marked as 'to-review'. Then, the admin would read the file, and make any changes (if necessary), and the file would be marked as 'to-commit'. At the end of day (throught a cron job) an update script would run and checkout any changes to files and would commit/add the new translations. With this solution, we would have better quality translations and we would have just one CVS account for each project. Any comments? Nuno Lopes
