On Tue, 03 Aug 2004 16:06:06 +0000 Gabor Hojtsy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>The en manual passes make test and make test_xml, and I have no > >plans>to do more fixes today, so only the translations might be > >problematic.>It is up to the translation teams actually to fix them. > > > > > > How can translations be problematic if they can't have their own > > contributors.xml? =)---- > > <!-- > > This file shold only be present in the English doc tree. If you > > copy it over to your translation tree you will be hunted down > > relentlessly! You have been warned! :) > > --> > > ---- > > > > Btw, Russian translation passes make test fine. > > They have their own bookinfo.xml file, and with the new > contributors.xml file and the old (yesterdays version :) boookinfo.xml > file, a <sect1> would be added into a <sect1>, which is not possible. > Those who have not yet linked their bookinfo with contributions.xml > will not have a broken build (because of this reason). They might have > a broken build for another reason... Aha, got it. Btw, I'll change bookinfo then, as it is really not linked with contributors.xml. I'm doing make test often enough, so you can be almost sure that En & Ru are ok, if I'm not screaming about broken build yet. --- WBR, Antony Dovgal aka tony2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] || [EMAIL PROTECTED]
