> -----Original Message----- > From: Derick Rethans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 03 July 2007 10:17 > To: Richard Quadling > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/appendices license.xml > > On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Richard Quadling wrote: > > > rquadling Tue Jul 3 09:10:08 2007 UTC > > > > Modified files: > > /phpdoc/en/appendices license.xml > > Log: > > Duplicate prohibition removed. > > I don't think it's a good idea to change the license. You > might have changed a legal meaning here. If the original OPL > did not change this, neither should we. And as far as I can > see they didn't change it. > > Derick > > -- > Derick Rethans > http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org >
In this instance, it is just a typo. The intent is very clear ... B. To prohibit any publication of this work or derivative works in whole or in part in standard (paper) book form for commercial purposes (*** REMOVED *** is prohibited *** REMOVED ***) unless prior permission is obtained from the copyright holder. To accomplish this, add the phrase 'Distribution of the work or derivative of the work in any standard (paper) book form is prohibited unless prior permission is obtained from the copyright holder.' to the license reference or copy.
