On 7/3/07, Richard A. Quadling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Derick Rethans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 03 July 2007 10:17
> To: Richard Quadling
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/appendices license.xml
>
> On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Richard Quadling wrote:
>
> > rquadling Tue Jul 3 09:10:08 2007 UTC
> >
> > Modified files:
> > /phpdoc/en/appendices license.xml
> > Log:
> > Duplicate prohibition removed.
>
> I don't think it's a good idea to change the license. You
> might have changed a legal meaning here. If the original OPL
> did not change this, neither should we. And as far as I can
> see they didn't change it.
>
> Derick
>
> --
> Derick Rethans
> http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org
>
In this instance, it is just a typo. The intent is very clear ...
I agree with Derick here. Even if it turns out to be a typo we should
not change it unless the original license itself hasn't been changed,
no matter how clear it may or may not be.
-Hannes
