> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Niel<spam-f...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: > > Hi > > > >> When a translator updates a translation (a file), they write which CVS > >> Revision in EN it's synced to. So, later when the EN version is > >> updated we then know that the translated is outdated. And all of our > >> translation tools rely on the incremental nature of CVS revision > >> numbers.
he he I didn't write it, only quoted. > Why is this a problem? SVN revision numbers are incremental as well. > I don't see the difference between tying a translation to CVS-123456 > and SVN-123456? I'm not particularly familiar with CVS (fortunately), so someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe it gives each file a revision number to uniquely identify its version. Where as SVN only has a single revision number for the entire repository. -- Niel Archer niel.archer (at) blueyonder.co.uk
