On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 11:59, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Hannes Magnusson > <hannes.magnus...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> This thread is about mongo (with general explanation of how things work). >> Mongo uses nothing of the PHP infrastructure, other then maybe PECL >> packaging. They have external repo, bug tracker and support channels - >> just like xdebug. > > We knew that when we accepted this extension and I have no problem > with continuing to publish the mongo documentation. Or to be more > clear, I see no reason to change anything in our policy right now.
I have a big problem with it. This has been the policy for years. In the end, its the doc teams call (hence the CC). >> We have no control whatsoever over anything, and therefore cannot even >> pay attention to new features to document. We simply cannot have docs >> for extensions not maintain in our infrastructure. > > If you want to force every pecl's project to use svn.php.net and > pecl's bug trackers, then please make a proposal. I don't want to enforce it. But to get the docs in the PHP manual certain rules have to be followed, and this is one of them. > For one, I would rather go (and will propose it) down the way to > integrate external services like github and bitbucket with our > infrastructures to be sure that PECL remains the place to be for PHP's > innovations (it is not anymore). I'm definitely a +1 on that if done properly. > I don't have a problem either with projects using both pecl and > external trackers (makes sense for daemon clients as some bugs may > move from server to client). Howevere I do understand your feeling > while looking at xdebug (but still has no issue). Using external bug tracker for the extension and then our tracker for doc issues doesn't make sense. The doc team simply cannot follow random bug trackers. -Hannes
