hi, On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Hannes Magnusson <hannes.magnus...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It is waaay to much hassle to work with things outside of our domain. > If all the things around the extension is external, then your users > expect to find the manual at your site anyway.. As I said already numerous times in this discussion: - the developers are available via the normal and standard way, the pecl's tracker, the mailing list and on IRC too for some of them - The developers read the bugs via the bug trackers too Alternatively I have no problem either to request the use of the pecl's bug tracker (if another one is also used, that's not a problem as long as pecl's tracker is allowed too). Doing so will minimize the pain for patch ore request submission. Now, if the php-doc team considers to stop hosting documentation for PECL's extension not having their repository in svn.php.net, then it is a rather drastic change and I have to think a bit further about the consequences of such changes in our policies. About users expecting everything to be at other location, my personal experience told me that they don't. They install an extension using 'pecl install foo' and then go to www.php.net/foo to find the doc (or via the TOC). Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org
