On 12 Apr, 11:51, "Matthew Peters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Yesterday (on the BUZZARD branch only) I changed our "ws" binding to
> be "soap" i.e. wherever you had @binding.ws you now need
> @binding.soap. I changed all the examples and test cases too.
> Graham and I had decided a few weeks back to do this - "ws" was too
> generic and meaningless.
> This is just on the BUZZARD branch for now, but next release this
> change will be merged into HEAD and then in the released package. I
> need to get the documentation sorted out before then.
> I did not do anything about continuing to permit ws and deprecating
> it. I could do so, easily enough: just continue to have a Binding/ws
> directory and issue a notice each time. It seems overkill for a
> package which is really still EXPERIMENTAL. Does anyone think it
I like the name change. As long as we have a large banner in the
release notes I think it will be ok at this stage in the package
development otherwise we will never get rid of it. If you are going to
do it now is the time.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at