On 27 Apr, 16:39, Matthew Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I did get some misbehaviour when I run these tests, but I have fixed
> them both.
> (1)
> One stems from the lines like this on in RestRpcTest.php::setUp() as
> follows:
>         $this->response = file_get_contents("SCA/phpunit/RestRpc/
> RestRpcTestService.response");
> I have fixed them to be like this:
>         $this->response = file_get_contents(dirname(__FILE__) . "/
> RestRpcTestService.response");
> which makes the tests independent of where they are run from.
> (2)
> I have also changed uses of header() to SCA::sendHttpHeader(), which I
> originally put in so that we could add unit tests for anything coming
> out of header(); also it means you don't get the "Cannot modify header
> information" messages which I otherwise get all the time.
> I have checked these changes in.
> There is now only one failure which is the SMD generation test.  Shall
> I mark this as to be skipped? Or raise a defect?
> Matthew
> On Apr 27, 2:31 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I've checked some tests in for JsonRpc and RestRpc Although they run I
> > am getting some warnings. I've taken the approach with the tests of
> > trying to push tests messages through as much of the infrastructure as
> > possible and parts of it are complaining about being run in a test
> > environment. Anyhow I prefer to have the tests with warnings rather
> > than no tests at all.
> > I've also added some more SCA examples base on some of the examples
> > that have been used at recent conferences.
> > Simon

Thanks for doing that Matthew. I didn't get a failure with SMD
generation so let me try it again wit your changes.


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"phpsoa" group.
To post to this group, send email to phpsoa@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to