Caplan, Michael wrote: > Forgive my ignorance, but why does the WSDL generator define all types > as nillable? Should that not be defined depending on the prototype of > the method it is bound to?
You're right, there's a lot of information available from the ReflectionParameter methods (allowsNull(), isOptional(), isDefaultValueAvailable(), ...) which isn't being exploited at the moment, but could potentially be used to improve the fidelity of the generated WSDL. It's likely that Matthew already thought about this when he developed that code and will know what the issues are. I'd say these enhancements sound like wish-list items for someone ... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "phpsoa" group. To post to this group, send email to phpsoa@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.co.uk/group/phpsoa?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
