Thanks for the feedback!  I've opened a request ticket (#10989) relate
to the nillable issue.

Best,

Mike


> -----Original Message-----
> From: phpsoa@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Caroline Maynard
> Sent: May 9, 2007 8:03 AM
> To: phpsoa@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [phpsoa] Re: nillable
> 
> 
> Caplan, Michael wrote:
> > Forgive my ignorance, but why does the WSDL generator define all
> types
> > as nillable?  Should that not be defined depending  on the prototype
> of
> > the method it is bound to?
> 
> You're right, there's a lot of information available from the
> ReflectionParameter methods (allowsNull(), isOptional(),
> isDefaultValueAvailable(), ...) which isn't being exploited at the
> moment, but could potentially be used to improve the fidelity of the
> generated WSDL. It's likely that Matthew already thought about this
> when
> he developed that code and will know what the issues are. I'd say
these
> enhancements sound like wish-list items for someone ...
> 
> 
> E-mail messages may contain viruses, worms, or other malicious code. By 
> reading the message and opening any attachments, the recipient accepts full 
> responsibility for taking protective action against such code. Henry Schein 
> is not liable for any loss or damage arising from this message.

The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It 
is intended solely for the addressee(s). Access to this e-mail by anyone else 
is unauthorized.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"phpsoa" group.
To post to this group, send email to phpsoa@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/phpsoa?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to