OK, several things got discussed here but picking out the essential attitude to the initial question:
Mike C says (I am quoting from pecl defect 10994): " I would like to suppress everything with the exception of the exception description and number. Exposing files and backtraces in exceptions to the end user I think is too much info to expose (for security reasons, and simplicity). " Graham says "I think Mike is right that we shouldn't always flow this information. It is a potential security hole as it could divulge more information than we would like." Simon says "I wouldn't expect that a stack trace is required or even useful." That seems a pretty clear message that the default behaviour at least should be to suppress the details from the remote exception. We can debate another time on whether or how it should be revealed, if anyone ever wants it. So, any volunteers to chop it out? We could stop generating the "This wsdl was generated..." comment at the bottom of the wsdl since it was only used for that. Matthew --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "phpsoa" group. To post to this group, send email to phpsoa@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.co.uk/group/phpsoa?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
