Hi Silvano, just to say that I bumped into Caroline who said she is going to take a look at it and see what it will take to get the right behaviour during xml generation.
Matthew On Jun 19, 10:40 am, Matthew Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Caroline, thanks for a very authoritative answer, as always. The > one we are going to need to fix, of course, is the Tuscany behaviour, > and what it does on $xmldas->saveString($xdoc), since that is what we > use to generate the XML for the soap response ... unless we do some > horrid fix up of the generated xml afterwards. Can you work out what > the Tuscany change needs to be? > > Matthew > > On Jun 19, 2:33 am, "Silvano Girardi Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 9:05 PM, Caroline Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I think this accounts for the behaviour of Matthew's testcase. But we're > > > going through similar Tuscany code when converting between SDOs and XML, > > > and this will really need a Tuscany change. > > > > I did check this against the SDO 2.1 spec, and that expects doubles and > > > floats to be printed as [0-9]*('.'[0-9])?('E'|'e'). So I don't know > > > where Tuscany got its format. Certainly not from the XML schema spec: > > >http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#float. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "phpsoa" group. To post to this group, send email to phpsoa@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.co.uk/group/phpsoa?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---