Comment #14 on issue 22 by [email protected]: Name property for PNodes http://code.google.com/p/piccolo2d/issues/detail?id=22
using the client properties as backing storage makes the value check senseless. Also opens the door to name clashes for this important property with special meaning. So no, it's not a good idea. Also firing change events for name sound really odd to me. A node's name shouldn't change during it's lifetime. P.S.: I wished there was a name property a year ago, when I wanted to integrate with https://appframework.dev.java.net/intro/ - it's Resource-Injection is based on a "name" property... -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Piccolo2D Developers Group: http://groups.google.com/group/piccolo2d-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
