Hi Jon,
> The test "(if (car Lst) ..." determines whether the current element is a
> container ("hoy") or not ("inner").
Is the 'car' necessary? Otherwise a simple test of 'Lst' would suffice.
BTW, I always feel that a 'prog' is a kind of kludge, and avoid it
if possible by inverting the 'if'. Then the following would also do:
(ifn Lst
(prinl " />")
(prin ">")
(run Lst 1)
(prinl "</" Tag ">") ) ) ) )
But perhaps this is a matter of taste.
> Since this is "pure" XML, it would seem natural to find a function like
> this <xml> in lib/xml.l. I haven't studied the functions in that file
Tomas also suggested this. I think it is a good idea. I would like to
let Tomas make the final decision and/or design.
Cheers,
- Alex
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
