> Would it be a good idea for these to become part of picolisp as we
> discussed earlier?
Sure. Both the new '<xml>' as well as the improved 'xml' should be
included. I tried "xml2-test.l", and it passed all tests.
I would suggest to put '<xml>' and the changes into "lib/xml.l". What do
you think? Can you merge them together, and send it to me during this
week? Then it can be included in picoLisp-2.3.5 due to the end of this