Hi Tomas, > Would it be a good idea for these to become part of picolisp as we > discussed earlier?
Sure. Both the new '<xml>' as well as the improved 'xml' should be included. I tried "xml2-test.l", and it passed all tests. I would suggest to put '<xml>' and the changes into "lib/xml.l". What do you think? Can you merge them together, and send it to me during this week? Then it can be included in picoLisp-2.3.5 due to the end of this month. Cheers, - Alex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picol...@software-lab.de?subject=unsubscribe