Much better! :)

On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 3:49 AM, Kazimir Majorinc <kazi...@chem.pmf.hr>wrote:

> My apologizes - I don't know what happened, but I
> made some changes to software, and I'm sending this again.
>
> ------------
>
> Dear PicoLispers,
>
> This is my first post on this list. I maintain blog on Lisp, mostly about
> Newlisp, which shares similar philosophy to PicoLisp. Among other articles,
> there are few simple benchmarks designed to measure speed of eval in various
> Lisp implementation. I recently added benchmark results for PicoLisp. If you
> are interested to see how it compares to other Lisp implementations
> regarding eval take a look here:
>
>
> http://kazimirmajorinc.blogspot.com/2010/01/picolisp-and-openlisp-new-eval-speed.html
>
> or just Google Majorinc PicoLisp (without quotes)
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Kazimir Majorinc
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> On 30.1.2010 12:48, Jon Kleiser wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Kazimir's mail arrived empty in my Thunderbird, and doesn't show at all in
>> the PicoLisp mail archive here:
>> <http://www.mail-archive.com/picolisp@software-lab.de/>
>> .. just like the mail from Eugene a while back.
>>
>> /Jon
>>
>>  Hello Kazimir,
>>>
>>> thank you for performing the tests! Interesting to see :-)
>>> And thanks for keeping up the spirit of Lisp!
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> - Alex
>>> --
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picol...@software-lab.de?subject=unsubscribe
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2656 - Release Date: 01/29/10
>> 20:35:00
>>
>>
> --
> UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picol...@software-lab.de?subject=unsubscribe
>

Reply via email to