Much better! :) On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 3:49 AM, Kazimir Majorinc <[email protected]>wrote:
> My apologizes - I don't know what happened, but I > made some changes to software, and I'm sending this again. > > ------------ > > Dear PicoLispers, > > This is my first post on this list. I maintain blog on Lisp, mostly about > Newlisp, which shares similar philosophy to PicoLisp. Among other articles, > there are few simple benchmarks designed to measure speed of eval in various > Lisp implementation. I recently added benchmark results for PicoLisp. If you > are interested to see how it compares to other Lisp implementations > regarding eval take a look here: > > > http://kazimirmajorinc.blogspot.com/2010/01/picolisp-and-openlisp-new-eval-speed.html > > or just Google Majorinc PicoLisp (without quotes) > > Sincerely, > > Kazimir Majorinc > > > > --------------------------------------------------------- > On 30.1.2010 12:48, Jon Kleiser wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Kazimir's mail arrived empty in my Thunderbird, and doesn't show at all in >> the PicoLisp mail archive here: >> <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/> >> .. just like the mail from Eugene a while back. >> >> /Jon >> >> Hello Kazimir, >>> >>> thank you for performing the tests! Interesting to see :-) >>> And thanks for keeping up the spirit of Lisp! >>> >>> Cheers, >>> - Alex >>> -- >>> UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2656 - Release Date: 01/29/10 >> 20:35:00 >> >> > -- > UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe >
