I just found conflicting stuff in my code, I have a relation looking like
this:
(rel feeds (+List +Ref +Link) NIL (+Feed))
In one place I have the following line:
(put> Usr 'feeds Feed)
But I also have the following class methods:
(dm addFeed> (F)
(let Feeds (; This feeds)
(push1 'Feeds F)
(put!> This 'feeds Feeds)))
(dm removeFeed> (F)
(put!> This 'feeds (delete F (; This feeds))))
The first example of assignment seems to imply that put> will automatically
take care of adding a new feed to the list, ie. not replacing the whole list
with a new list containing only one feed.
The second and third examples seems to imply though that put> isn't really
that smart and that the whole list needs to be replaced upon each change.
Which case is the correct case here?
/Henrik
