On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 03:04:21PM +0200, Jakob Eriksson wrote:
> > ATM I cannot see how this could be useful. PicoLisp has no threads, and
> If you defined "threads" less strict, such that processes could be "threads",
> could it make sense then?

Only if some shared/mapped memory is used, as far as I understand.
What advantages would you see, and for which purpose?

- Alex
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Reply via email to