On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 03:04:21PM +0200, Jakob Eriksson wrote: > > ATM I cannot see how this could be useful. PicoLisp has no threads, and > > If you defined "threads" less strict, such that processes could be "threads", > could it make sense then?
Only if some shared/mapped memory is used, as far as I understand. What advantages would you see, and for which purpose? Cheers, - Alex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe