On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 03:57:49PM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote: > On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 03:04:21PM +0200, Jakob Eriksson wrote: > > > ATM I cannot see how this could be useful. PicoLisp has no threads, and > > > > If you defined "threads" less strict, such that processes could be > > "threads", > > could it make sense then? > > Only if some shared/mapped memory is used, as far as I understand. > What advantages would you see, and for which purpose?
Don't know, these things are over my head, I was hoping someone here would know more than me and say, "yes, this is good because"... :-) > > Cheers, > - Alex > -- > UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe
