On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 03:57:49PM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 03:04:21PM +0200, Jakob Eriksson wrote:
> > > ATM I cannot see how this could be useful. PicoLisp has no threads, and
> > 
> > If you defined "threads" less strict, such that processes could be 
> > "threads",
> > could it make sense then?
> 
> Only if some shared/mapped memory is used, as far as I understand.
> What advantages would you see, and for which purpose?


Don't know, these things are over my head, I was hoping someone here
would know more than me and say, "yes, this is good because"... :-)



> 
> Cheers,
> - Alex
> -- 
> UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
-- 
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Reply via email to