José Romero <> writes:

> It's not an improvement, and not worth it, imo. The current wiki syntax
> is pretty much a lightweight variant of TeX, Emacs can fontify TeX just
> fine, so the issue is in the emacs mode, not the syntax.

It does look pretty ugly, I agree, and I wasn't sure myself if it would
be such a good idea. It would make some things easier, but these things
are not impossible with the current syntax either. 

Thanks for the feedback, I think you are right. 



Reply via email to