I apologize for the confusion, the issue was completely unrelated to the core functionality, it's all good.
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 1:08 AM, Alexander Burger <a...@software-lab.de> wrote: > Hi Henrik, > >> Hi, I'm trying to add a relation, at first I added (rel newRel >> (+String)) to the class, and then put newRel in the dbs. > > Right, though adding to 'dbs' makes only sense for indexes (i.e. as you > did with the (rel newRel (+Ref +String)) below). > > >> That didn't work though, information refused to get saved so I changed >> the rel call to (rel newRel (+Ref +String)) but still the database >> refuses to store anything in newRel when using for instance put!>. > > Strange. This should definitely work. There must be some other problem. > Can you try to debug it more? > > Is there an error? For example, 'put!>' will complain in the 'has>' > method if the relation is not known. > > ♪♫ Alex > -- > UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=Unsubscribe -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:email@example.com?subject=Unsubscribe