On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Alexander Burger <a...@software-lab.de> wrote:
>> 1) Regarding this snippet: (for ((I . N) 11 (not (= I 4)) (inc N)) (list I 
>> N))
>> the official PicoLisp and ersatz 27 return (4 14),
>> but ersatz 29 (currently the most recent version) returns (3 13).
>
> Correct. This was fixed a while ago, on Tue Oct 02 09:16:10 2012
> (Increment 'for' counter before the condition).

Ha ha, funny that I trusted the real, but ancient, PicoLisp.
Even more funny: I now understand that the number 27 or 29 is not the version
but the (fake) pointer of the (version) function in ersatz.

> Oops, yes! I've fixed it. It is now in 3.1.6.5 JVM.
>
> Thanks again!

Thanks to you for the quick fix.


chri

-- 

http://profgra.org/lycee/ (site pro)
http://delicious.com/profgraorg (liens, favoris)
https://twitter.com/profgraorg
-- 
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Reply via email to