On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Alexander Burger <a...@software-lab.de> wrote: >> 1) Regarding this snippet: (for ((I . N) 11 (not (= I 4)) (inc N)) (list I >> N)) >> the official PicoLisp and ersatz 27 return (4 14), >> but ersatz 29 (currently the most recent version) returns (3 13). > > Correct. This was fixed a while ago, on Tue Oct 02 09:16:10 2012 > (Increment 'for' counter before the condition).
Ha ha, funny that I trusted the real, but ancient, PicoLisp. Even more funny: I now understand that the number 27 or 29 is not the version but the (fake) pointer of the (version) function in ersatz. > Oops, yes! I've fixed it. It is now in 188.8.131.52 JVM. > > Thanks again! Thanks to you for the quick fix. chri -- http://profgra.org/lycee/ (site pro) http://delicious.com/profgraorg (liens, favoris) https://twitter.com/profgraorg -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=Unsubscribe