Alabhya Singh <[email protected]> writes: > The layout of RnRS has Contents categories, BNF, Program structure, > Formal syntax and semantics etc to give a succinct outline. > > PicoLisp docs need reorganization to be in RnRS type "standard form" > of documentation. This will help users.
I'm sure Alex is open for patches and contributions ... wouldn't writing the PicoLisp RnRS be a nice way to learn everything about the language? OTOH I don't think there are many non-mainstream languages as well documented as PicoLisp. Did you have a look at ,---- | http://www.scribd.com/doc/103732688/PicoLisp-Works `---- and ,---- | http://www.scribd.com/doc/103733857/PicoLisp-by-Example `---- ? Thats like 2000 pages of docs and examples ... > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > From: Thorsten Jolitz > <[email protected]>; > To: <[email protected]>; > Subject: Re: RnRS > Sent: Wed, Jul 16, 2014 8:41:01 AM > > > Alabhya Singh <[email protected]> > writes: > > > Dear List, > > > > RnRS for picoLisp will help immensely. > > > > Even in documentation, perfection is achieved with irreducibility. > > Isn't [[http://software-lab.de/doc/ref.html][The PicoLisp Reference]] > just that - its RnRs? -- cheers, Thorsten -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe
