Hi Christophe, > Is there somewhere some info about "" being NIL?
http://software-lab.de/doc/ref.html#nilSym ... • to represent a string of length zero ... http://software-lab.de/doc/ref.html#nilSym-io Besides for standard normal form, NIL is also recognized as (), [] or "" > I'd like to know why, maybe with some historical hindsight, There is no special history to it. > The language I'm trying to embed in PicoLisp would love to have > "" and NIL different ! Why? I believe this is a wonderful feature! A lot of PicoLisp's expressive power is a result of this universality of NIL. ♪♫ Alex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe
