Hi Christophe, > > it doesn't have to be always 1.0. If it was, it would not need to be > > there at all. > > Oops. Could you give me some details about my mistake? > Isn't «1.0» always read as «10^(*Scl)» which is what I'd call the scale > factor?
Yes, but *Scl is concerned only in the reader, when expanding the quasi-read-macro '.'. Other parts of the program may well use another scale, independent of '*Scl'. For example, each '+FixField' in the GUI knows about its own private scale factor. ♪♫ Alex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe
