> > it doesn't have to be always 1.0. If it was, it would not need to be
> > there at all.
> Oops. Could you give me some details about my mistake?
> Isn't «1.0» always read as «10^(*Scl)» which is what I'd call the scale
Yes, but *Scl is concerned only in the reader, when expanding the
Other parts of the program may well use another scale, independent of
'*Scl'. For example, each '+FixField' in the GUI knows about its own
private scale factor.