I wasn't precent in the IRC but this seems to be a non-issue, if
people want syntax highlighting they can implement the VIM files
themselves, for emacs there are the files in lib/el.

FWIW, I've attached what my emacs looks like.

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:02 AM,  <andr...@itship.ch> wrote:
> Hi List :-)
>> Hi Christophe,
>>> > I'm opposed to syntax highlighting of symbols in PicoLisp.
>>> Wao, this is quite an introduction for a post on the list !
>>> I guess that it is not spontaneous and may be triggered by a discussion
>>> on IRC?
>> Correct :) Though incidentally not IRC this time, but an e-mail
>> conversation.
> Maybe add a comment at the beginning regarding this, so we know too ;-)
>> Anyway, this issue popped up relatively often during the last years. My
>> impression was that some people naturally expect syntax highlighting, or
>> even demand it, and I felt I should also make my position clear.
> There is nothing to demand, People need to learn that.
> Don't let them bugger you so much, Alex.
> It's to be expected that people ask for things they are used to from
> whatever corner of programming they come from, and we (as a community)
> should surely improve the current state of documentation and availability
> of knowlegde surrounding PicoLisp. But I personally don't see this as the
> responsibility and personal task of Alex! The amount of work he puts into
> PicoLisp and the huge efforts he makes to answer questions should be more
> then enough.
> PicoLisp is Free Software, so there is nothing to stop people to use it
> however they like. In my eyes, this also means there is NO excuse to not
> do that. No need to harass Alex, I'm pretty sure there is a way to achieve
> everything with PicoLisp by doing some research (rtfm and searching the
> mailinglist archive) or by hacking it together yourself.
> This comment I mean not just in the context of syntax style, but also
> about other "missing functionality" and "missing library" - just find a
> way yourself! And then contribute something back, share it on the mailing
> list or in the wiki on picolisp.com or just put it on your own web
> presence. (Alex is doing exactly that all the time - some others too).
> Back to topic:
> There are many editors with general lisp syntax highlighting there, even
> the emacs extensions in the official PicoLisp distribution contains one for
> picolisp.
> That one I actually use, but mainly as typo-detector,
> the bigger benefit I get from paredit-mode, which handles indentation and is
> really great for editing S-Expressions.
> For other editors, there are often simple ways to even write your own
> syntax highlighting config file, e.g. for nano (google for nanorc).
>>> More precisely, concerning the language I’m basing on PicoLisp, which
>>> is
>>> dedicated to beginners, I'd like to say:
>>> - Coloring transient symbols is important to help students spot quote
>>> errors
>>>   (which may be trivial, but can occur with people not used to
>>> programming)
> Good point, but then you probably want a syntax highlighting customized to
> your "language based on PicoLisp", and not just for "Alex standard way to
> do it". Lisp evolves with the current user, so I think thats the overall
> reason why there can't be _one_right_way_.
> Have all a nice day and good start into the week,
> Andreas

Reply via email to