On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Alexander Burger <a...@software-lab.de> wrote: > Hi Christophe, > >> Trying to port tests to miniPicoLisp I needed to copy some >> definitions from lib/misc.l from pico to mini, and this is what I found: >> >> 1) Many definitions don't appear in pico. Is it intented ? If so, why ? > > Don't appear in *mini*, you mean?
Yes sorry. > Well, yes, it is "mini" after all ;) And I plan to make an even smaller version! >> Just to mention my findings. It may be intented for the sake of >> simplicity of mini. > > Thanks! I put 'format' in mini into my todo list :) Glad to see you are interested. Two others, but I understand that mini could have severe limitations that would prevent a fix: 1) «seed» only accepts numbers in mini, 2) «in» doesn't support negative numbers in mini. I'll keep you updated if I find some more. chri -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:email@example.com?subject=Unsubscribe