That's great...thank you very much.
On 27 January 2017 at 06:53, Alexander Burger <a...@software-lab.de> wrote:
> Hi Dean,
> > i.e. I'm calling m1 from m2 using the same syntax as calling methods
> > externally....but just replacing *Obj with This.
> Yes, that's fine.
> > No problem if not but....Is there a shorter way e.g. like (: member)
> > instead of (get This 'member)
> Yes, (: member) is the same as (get This 'member) or (; This member).
> doesn't show up in your code though.
> > (class +Clss)
> > (dm T ())
> > (dm m1> () (setq Res 4))
> > (dm m2> (Arg2) (+ (send 'm1> This) Arg2))
> Instead of (send 'm1> This) you would usually write (m1> This)
> > (setq *Obj (new '(+Clss)))
> > (prinl (format (send 'm2> *Obj 5)))
> and (m2> Obj 5)
> ♪♫ Alex
> UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=Unsubscribe