I'll certainly do that if need arises, though I think it would be better
if the release actually had them in there from the start. But if the
lead developer is set against it, I'm not going to keep whining about it.
Nevertheless, I would strongly recommend *at least* putting licensing
server, it will be impossible for Web users to tell that it is freely
licensed code. Code with unclear licensing is no better than proprietary
code for practical purposes.
On 03/11/2017 02:23 AM, Jakob Eriksson wrote:
> What I do when incorporating a source file which has no license or
> copyright information at the top:
> I just add it... it takes a couple of minutes, tops and then I'm done.