Thx. Andreas! Op ma 28 mei 2018 22:29 schreef <andr...@itship.ch>:
> Naming Conventions: https://software-lab.de/doc/ref.html#conv > > /beneroth > > Am 2018-05-28 16:54, schrieb Arie van Wingerden: > > Hi Olaf, > > > >> I do like your https://picolisp.com/wiki/?pcedefunction [1] wiki > >> page very much! > > > > Thx. You're welcome :) > > > >> For me, it does show the subtleties of the topic in a very clear and > >> comprehensible way (even reproducible). > > > > Nice. Reproducability is a thing I really want. Examples that don't > > work straight away are often useless. > > > >> Just to distinguish 'x' from 'x' (see *1 below), would you mind, if > >> I would replace all 'x' function names by 'foo' on your fine > >> article? > > > > Of course. I even missed the duplication of 'x'. I'll go for foo, > > baar, baz etc. > > > >> And just to follow the picolisp convention, to uppercase the > >> function Parameter Variables? > > > > Didn't know the convention, but will change that :) > > > >> Second, a comment concerning the conclusion: > >> 'very uninteresting function' ... it looks like, that these words > >> are spoken by 'the master' :-) himself, > >> but may be in some context, which is not seen within this quotation. > >> (Otherwise I would miss a lot of ratings for other functions in the > >> docs :-) ). > > > > Alex quoted that in a response. He later weakened the word > > "uninteresting" a bit. > > I kept it, because it was funny somehow. > > But, point taken. I just removed it! > > > >> Sth. like 'de is equivalent to' followed by the setq examples would > >> sound less judgmental and the decision what to use is left to the > >> reader/user. > > > > OK. > > > >> By the way, I did not try, because always used 'de' instead of > >> 'setq' for function definitions, > >> but may be 'setq' in combination with the different function > >> parameter possibilities (see *2 below) becomes less > >> readable/distinguishable? > > > > I've now added a "final notice" on the difference between 'normal' > > functions and 'fexprs'. > > > >> I really enjoy reading your article, as it summarizes in a clear, > >> comprehensible way all the little facts and differences, which make > >> picolisp so unique. > >> Thank you very much! > > > > Thx. again. I intend to continue. > > Currently I am busy consolidating stuff from other websites in the > > Wiki (e.g. PLEAC). > > After that I hope to continue the other (new) stuff. > > > > As I did change things now, please check the page for errors left > > over! > > > > Thx. for the 'to the point' critique. I highly value that. It really > > is a way to learn! > > > > /Arie > > > > Links: > > ------ > > [1] https://picolisp.com/wiki/?pcedefunction > > -- > UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe >
