On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 10:51:44AM +0000, Alexander Williams wrote:
> The use of (++ Value) instead of (pop 'Value) may be an improvement, but it
> breaks backward compatibility with older clients since the time you
> implemented (++ Value), so I can't accept that in my libraries just yet.. at
> least not until I'm certain I don't have any applications with older
> PicoLisp clients deployed in the wild.

Oops, right.

But as the namespace system (04mar17) is newer than '++' (24nov16), it will
also break on such old systems.

☺/ A!ex

-- 
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Reply via email to