On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 10:09:19AM -0700, C K Kashyap wrote: > I see, if the assumption was long to be 64 bits then perhaps all the > "long"s in the code should be changed to int64_t .... I see that there are > several usages of long in the code other than the couple of places I > changed.
The general assumption in PicoLisp is that the "normal" scalar size is the same as the pointer size. On 32 bits both a pointer and a long are 32 bits, and on all 64 bit Unix systems I saw so far both were 64 bits. Thus, miniPicoLisp compiled fine both on 32 and 64 bit systems. > I was wondering though if there is some implementation of miniPicoLisp out > there that I could use as reference - perhaps just with the ability to call > an external program. You could perhaps use some parts of pil32 (?). ☺/ A!ex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:email@example.com?subject=Unsubscribe