> > > How do you mean that? Pil21 is not even finished for the first version. > > Perhaps I am remembering it incorrectly - I thought pil21 (a couple of months ago I think) - did not support 'fork'/'call' etc thereby making me thing it did not depend POSIX as heavily yet - when I say that I mean, depending on a wider range of the POSIX API set.
But anyway it was always POSIX (as pil32 and pil64). > again, miniPicoLisp is also POSIX compliant right - but it uses a very narrow slice of the POSIX API. Or am I understanding POSIX wrong here? > > ☺/ A!ex > > > -- > UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe >
