As bad an excuse that it may sound, it is the truth - I messed up my alarm setting (AM vs PM) :) and missed the meeting.
Could I request someone to please summarize what was discussed? particularly about the "interpreter only" approach. If it was not discussed then perhaps I can request Alex to write down his thoughts. Regards, Kashyap On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 2:59 PM Kevin Ednalino <kcednal...@gmail.com> wrote: > Personally, I work business hours so Friday mornings I'm generally > unavailable (GMT). > > I think at least one on the weekday in the afternoon/evening and one on > the weekend might be the most convenient with the latter more convenient > for non-European timezones. For example, if it's hosted on Saturday at noon > then it'd be roughly morning for the Americas and evening for Asia. > > If doing 2x meetings a month, then alternating each month with the > weekday/weekend day might maximize availability like if someone is busy > during the week and/or busy during the weekend (if busy both times, just > have to wait untill the next meeting!): > > Month: Week 1 / Week 2 > Nov: Wed/Sat > Dec: Fri/Sun > Jan: Wed/Sat > ... > > Or even alternate just weekends weekly between Saturday and Sunday. > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 6:42 PM Alexander Burger <a...@software-lab.de> > wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 01:23:13PM -0500, r cs wrote: >> > Raw video would be welcomed. The timing of the PilCon can be >> challenging >> > in some time zones. >> >> Independent of the recording issue, the current scheduling is not an >> absolute >> must. I did a proposal initially, and nobody complained, so we stayed >> with it. >> >> Should we consider a change for the future? Perhaps Saturday would be >> better >> than Friday? And/or some other UTC time(s)? Should we try some democratic >> decision process? >> >> ☺/ A!ex >> >> -- >> UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe >> >>
