Hi Erik, > > 1. If the result of the evaluation is a list, we get the same result as > > now. > > 2. But if the result is an atom, it is automatically 'cons'ed into a > > cell. > ... > Works for me! I also often want to use a returned list without splicing, > ... > : (macro (2 4 (^(mapcar '((X) (+ X 2)) (4 6))))) > -> (2 4 (6 8))
Indeed! So I went ahead and implemented the extended 'fill' behavior. : (fill (1 ^(+ 1 1) 3)) -> (1 2 3) To make it more consistent, I also changed the '~' read macro in the same way. Now this works: : (~(- 4 3) (2 ~(+ 1 2) 4) 5) -> (1 (2 3 4) 5) Please all test, and let me know if the changes break anything. ☺/ A!ex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
