Dear Wiki user,

You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Pig Wiki" for change 
notification.

The "SemanticsCleanup" page has been changed by AlanGates.
http://wiki.apache.org/pig/SemanticsCleanup?action=diff&rev1=2&rev2=3

--------------------------------------------------

  || [[https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1584|PIG-1584]] || Grammar || 
Cogroup inner does not match the semantics of inner join.  It is also not clear 
what value the inner keyword has for cogroup. Consider removing it. || ||
  || [[https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1538|PIG-1538]] || Nested 
types || Remove two level access || Maybe, if we can find a way to ignore calls 
to Schema.isTwoLevelAccessRequired(). ||
  || [[https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1536|PIG-1536]] || Schema || 
Pick one semantic for schema merges and use it consistently throughout Pig || 
no ||
+ || [[https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1371|PIG-1371]] || Nested 
types || unknown || ||
  || [[https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1341|PIG-1341]] || Dynamic 
type binding || Close as won't fix || yes ||
  || [[https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1281|PIG-1281]] || Dynamic 
type binding || In situations where a Hadoop shuffle key is assumed to be of 
type bytearray wrap the value in a tuple so that if the type is actually 
something else Hadoop can still process it. || yes ||
  || [[https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1277|PIG-1277]] || Nested 
types || Unknown || ||
+ || [[https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1222|PIG-1222]] || Dynamic 
type binding || The issue here is that Pig thinks the field is a bytearray 
while BinStorage actually produces a String.  Need a way to handle these issues 
on the fly. || ||
  || [[https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1188|PIG-1188]] || Schema || 
Make sure Pig handles missing data in Tuples by returning a null rather than 
failing. || yes ||
  || [[https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1112|PIG-1112]] || Schema || 
When user provides AS to flatten of undefined bag or tuple, the contents of 
that AS are taken to be the schema of the bag or tuple. || yes ||
  || [[https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1065|PIG-1065]] || Dynamic 
type binding ||  In situations where a Hadoop shuffle key is assumed to be of 
type bytearray wrap the value in a tuple so that if the type is actually 
something else Hadoop can still process it. || yes ||
  || [[https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-999|PIG-999]] || Dynamic type 
binding ||  In situations where a Hadoop shuffle key is assumed to be of type 
bytearray wrap the value in a tuple so that if the type is actually something 
else Hadoop can still process it. || yes ||
+ || [[https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-847|PIG-847]] || Nested types 
|| Remove two level access || maybe ||
+ || [[https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-828|PIG-828]] || Nested types 
|| According to the rules of Pig Latin, this should produce a bag with one 
field.  Need to make sure that is what Pig is trying to do in this case. || yes 
||
  || [[https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-767|PIG-767]] || Nested types 
|| Remove two level access; bring DUMP and DESCRIBE output into sync. || no ||
+ || [[https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-749|PIG-749]] || Schema || 
Related to PIG-1112 || yes ||
  || [[https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-730|PIG-730]] || Nested types 
|| Make sure schema of union is the same as schema before union (suspect his is 
a two level access issue) || unclear ||
  || [[https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-723|PIG-723]] || Nested types 
|| Suspect this is a two level access issue || unclear ||
  || [[https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-696|PIG-696]] || Dynamic type 
binding || Class cast exceptions such as this should result in a null value and 
a warning, not a failure. || yes ||
  || [[https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-694|PIG-694]] || Nested types 
|| Determine the semantics for merging tuples and bags. || unclear ||
+ || [[https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-678|PIG-678]] || Grammar || 
Decide whether we want to support this extension. || yes ||
  || [[https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-621|PIG-621]] || Dynamic type 
binding || Class cast exceptions such as this should result in a null value and 
a warning, not a failure. || yes ||
  || [[https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-435|PIG-435]] || Schema || 
Decide definitely on what it means when users declare a schema for a load. || 
unclear ||
  || [[https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-333|PIG-333]] || Dynamic type 
binding || Since it is specified that MIN and MAX treat unknown types as 
double, all the actual string data should be converted to NULLs, rather than 
cause errors. || yes ||
  || [[https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-313|PIG-313]] || Grammar || I 
propose that we continue not supporting this.  But we should detect it at 
compile time rather than at runtime. || yes ||
+ 
+ Bugs I need to add this but haven't gotten to yet:
+ 
+ 438, 453, 496, 516, 666, 667
+ 
  
  == Discussion ==
  Removing two level access:

Reply via email to