Yes, I believe that we plan to keep our interfaces stable for some time.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nigel Daley [mailto:nda...@yahoo-inc.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 5:57 PM
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: Re: Next pig release
> If we're committing to backward compatibility for a while,
> then I'd +1 1.0.0. I think Pig is stable enough.
> On Mar 9, 2009, at 1:02 PM, Alan Gates wrote:
> > +1 on doing a release. +0 on calling it 1.0. Are we really that
> > stable?
> > Alan.
> > On Mar 6, 2009, at 5:28 PM, Olga Natkovich wrote:
> >> Pig Developers and Committers,
> >> Now that types branch is merged into trunk and the dust settled, I
> >> propose that it is time for the next release.
> >> I propose that we name this release as Pig 1.0.0 since this is a
> >> major
> >> rework and a much more stable and performant code with stable
> >> interfaces.
> >> Olga