No objections from me (I have enough crashes and fails to worry about, so "warns" are rarely something I have time for.)

It might make sense to have an option like GCC's "-Werror" that makes warnings errors. Though I suppose anybody interesting in finding out warnings can also run the json backend.

Jose

On 26/06/15 19:11, Mark Janes wrote:
Ilia Mirkin <[email protected]> writes:

So a test that otherwise passes (i.e. has a "pass" result code) but
generates errors in dmesg will get converted to a "dmesg-warn" code.
You were previously treating those as failures, but now will treat
them as success.

Yes.  I used the comment in framework/status.py to determine what
severities of piglit status correspond to JUnit failures:

     Status ordering from best to worst:

     pass
     dmesg-warn
     warn
     dmesg-fail
     fail
     timeout
     crash

If warn doesn't trigger a failure, then dmesg-warn shouldn't either.

I don't feel strongly either way, but just wanted to point it out for
your consideration. Also adding Jose who IIRC is also a junit user.
[I, btw, am not.]

Thanks, I should have remembered to do that.  In my own tests, I found
the following tests that were warning:

HSW, IVB, SNB, BDW:
  ext_transform_feedback.tessellation quads flat_last
  ext_transform_feedback.tessellation quad_strip flat_last
  ext_transform_feedback.tessellation polygon flat_last

The tests that provided output indicated pixel color accuracy was beyond
the warning threshold.

G45, G965:
  !opengl 1_1.teximage-colors gl_r32f
  !opengl 1_1.teximage-colors gl_rg32f
  !opengl 1_1.teximage-colors gl_rgb32f
  !opengl 1_1.teximage-colors gl_rgba32f

No output was provided for these warnings, so they may have have
previously been dmesg-warn.


On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Mark Janes <[email protected]> wrote:
JUnit has no concept of "warning".  It supports the following
statuses:

  - skip
  - success
  - fail
  - error

dEQP has been found to intermittently emit warnings for passed tests,
and this status is accurately represented in piglit json.  However,
current JUnit transforms them into failures.

A test which emits a warning is more accurately represented as
"success" in JUnit.
---
  framework/backends/junit.py | 3 +--
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/framework/backends/junit.py b/framework/backends/junit.py
index 632e516..7499829 100644
--- a/framework/backends/junit.py
+++ b/framework/backends/junit.py
@@ -142,8 +142,7 @@ class JUnitBackend(FileBackend):
              if data['result'] == 'skip':
                  res = etree.SubElement(element, 'skipped')

-            elif data['result'] in ['warn', 'fail', 'dmesg-warn',
-                                    'dmesg-fail']:
+            elif data['result'] in ['fail', 'dmesg-fail']:
                  if expected_result == "failure":
                      err.text += "\n\nWARN: passing test as an expected 
failure"
                      res = etree.SubElement(element, 'skipped',
--
2.1.4


_______________________________________________
Piglit mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit

Reply via email to