On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 7:25 PM, Dylan Baker <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 07:14:59PM -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Dylan Baker <[email protected]> wrote: >> > This adds a couple more unit tests, and a few fixes to the last version >> > of this series, with the notable addition being support xz compression >> > >> > Ilia: how would you feel about dropping shell support and just using >> > backports.lzma or not having xz support? >> >> No one's going to have it... I do see it in portage though. But I also >> don't immensely see the problem with just supporting shelling out to >> the binary. But I also haven't read the code yet :) > > Well, my assumption is that using pip backports.lzma would work on > windows and OSX (I don't know if it has an xz binary or not), while > shoveling things out to the shell only works on Unices (probably).
AKA 99.9% of piglit's userbase :) > > I don't care too much either way, really. It would just be a lot less > code. > > Dylan _______________________________________________ Piglit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
