On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 01:55:05PM -0700, Dylan Baker wrote: > It's worth noting that piglit run and piglit summary count tests > differently. > > Signed-off-by: Dylan Baker <[email protected]> > --- > README | 9 +++++++++ > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/README b/README > index 773a350..8381ff4 100644 > --- a/README > +++ b/README > @@ -274,6 +274,15 @@ The summary shows the 'status' of a test: > There are also dmesg-* statuses. These have the same meaning as above, but > are > triggered by dmesg related messages. > > +3.1 Note > +-------- > + > +The way 'piglit run' and 'piglit summary' count tests are different, 'piglit > +run' counts the number of Test derived instance in the profile(s) selected, > +while 'piglit summary' counts the number of subtests a result contains, or > it's > +result if there are no subtests. This means that the number shown by 'piglit > +run' and the total as calculated by 'piglit summary' may not match.
Isn't it piglit run <= piglit summary and never a smaller number in piglit summary than in piglit run? Might be good to clarify that, otherwise lgtm. -Daniel > + > > 4. Available test sets > ---------------------- > -- > 2.5.0 > > _______________________________________________ > Piglit mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Piglit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
