On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 5:32 AM, Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 01:55:05PM -0700, Dylan Baker wrote: > > It's worth noting that piglit run and piglit summary count tests > > differently. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dylan Baker <[email protected]> > > --- > > README | 9 +++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/README b/README > > index 773a350..8381ff4 100644 > > --- a/README > > +++ b/README > > @@ -274,6 +274,15 @@ The summary shows the 'status' of a test: > > There are also dmesg-* statuses. These have the same meaning as above, > but are > > triggered by dmesg related messages. > > > > +3.1 Note > > +-------- > > + > > +The way 'piglit run' and 'piglit summary' count tests are different, > 'piglit > > +run' counts the number of Test derived instance in the profile(s) > selected, > > +while 'piglit summary' counts the number of subtests a result contains, > or it's > > +result if there are no subtests. This means that the number shown by > 'piglit > > +run' and the total as calculated by 'piglit summary' may not match. > > Isn't it piglit run <= piglit summary and never a smaller number in piglit > summary than in piglit run? Might be good to clarify that, otherwise lgtm. > -Daniel > Yes, you are correct. I'll change that. > > > + > > > > 4. Available test sets > > ---------------------- > > -- > > 2.5.0 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Piglit mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit > > -- > Daniel Vetter > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation > http://blog.ffwll.ch >
_______________________________________________ Piglit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
