On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 8:09 PM, Dylan Baker <[email protected]> wrote:
> I agree with Ilia that making regressions and fixes non-symmetric is bad. So
> at
> the very least I'd want to see the same change to fixes.
>
> The regressions page was designed that someone could run piglit using "git
> rebase -x" and see what was regressing at each step along the way, and this
> change would definitely break that workflow. Wether anyone does that (or
> something like it) I don't know.
Totally not true. :) It was originally designed to compare 2 runs and
show transitions such as {pass,skip} -> {fail, crash} and {fail} ->
{crash}.
If this series doesn't change the behavior when comparing 2 runs, it's
OK with me.
Marek
_______________________________________________
Piglit mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
