Martin B?hr wrote:
>On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 07:40:08AM +0000, Per Hedbor () @ Pike (-) developers 
>forum wrote:
>> gcc 4.6+ generates broken code for calls to our (old) x86-32
>> machine-code.

>then as a stopgap measure we could say: if you want machinecode you need
>to use an older compiler. i think most linux distributions and i am
>pretty sure *bsd should still support gcc 4.5

>so at least a workaround is available which can be added to the
>releasenotes.

That is good enough for me, I guess.
Ideally the autoconfigure would detect that it is gcc 4.6 and then
disables machinecode automatically on 32 bit.
-- 
Stephen.

Expect the unexpected!
  • Re:... Henrik Grubbström (Lysator) @ Pike (-) developers forum
    • ... H. William Welliver III
      • ... Henrik Grubbström (Lysator) @ Pike (-) developers forum
        • ... Bill Welliver
          • ... H. William Welliver III
            • ... Stephen R. van den Berg
            • ... Per Hedbor () @ Pike (-) developers forum
            • ... Martin Bähr
            • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
            • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
            • ... Stephen R. van den Berg
            • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
            • ... Jonas Walldén @ Pike developers forum
            • ... Bill Welliver
            • ... Henrik Grubbström (Lysator) @ Pike (-) developers forum
            • ... H. William Welliver III
            • ... Tobias S. Josefowitz

Reply via email to