> I've had some time to think about this a little bit more, and I'm
> not completely convinced that it would be a good idea to back port a
> new machine code generator to 7.8. After all, that seems like a pretty
> major change to insert into what should theoretically be a stable
> release.

Agreed.

> Perhaps it makes more sense to release 7.8 as-is and then focus
> attention on doing a stable release of 7.9/7.10/8.0/whatever. How far
> from being stable is 7.9 at this point? I've dabbled with it, but
> haven't done much serious work with it yet.

The _Regexp.PCRE module will not compile if you have a recent (from
this spring) libpcre unless you have a Pike 7.8 from today.
  • Re:... H. William Welliver III
    • ... Stephen R. van den Berg
    • ... Per Hedbor () @ Pike (-) developers forum
    • ... Martin Bähr
    • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
    • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
    • ... Stephen R. van den Berg
    • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
    • ... Jonas Walldén @ Pike developers forum
    • ... Bill Welliver
    • ... Henrik Grubbstr�m (Lysator) @ Pike (-) developers forum
    • ... H. William Welliver III
    • ... Tobias S. Josefowitz

Reply via email to