On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum <10...@lyskom.lysator.liu.se> wrote: > And I'd be inclined to fix any acctual errors, rather than blindly > following one or the other. :-) > > Just so you know, the MAPPINGS files on unicode.org is not part of > the Unicode standard, so they are no more a standard than RFC 1345 is.
Oh! Okay. What is the standard? Where would I find an authoritative set of codepage-to-Unicode character set replacements? All I can confirm is that, with the changes I put through, Pike agrees with Python 3.4, and codepage 437 "looks right", neither of which is anything official. ChrisA
