On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 1:50 AM, Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum <10...@lyskom.lysator.liu.se> wrote: > Ok. Then my approach would be to keep things as they are until > someone comes up with a specific complaint. :-) As I said, the box > drawing stuff is fixed, so feel free to raise a new issue if you find > something else which is a concrete problem.
Yeah, I agree. Codepages are a mess anyway; as long as there's some kind of reasonably sane translation done, it's as good as it's going to be. > (As a side note, I think you were justified in assuming thick/double > lines was a font issue. There is no semantical difference, so I > imagine the only reason why Unicode assigns separate codepoints to > them instead of treating them as font variants is for compatibility > with some other encoding that has both...) No idea. To be quite honest, I wasn't even aware of those other box-drawing characters' existence until I came across this... there's so much Unicode that it's impossible to see it all. ChrisA
