Yes, I accidentally checked in the new refdoc code, and that's also why the online refdoc broke a couple of weeks ago. But since the plan was to get this stuff live shortly we let it go ;)
The first bug you mentioned with the menu not always loading I have fixed. I'll check that in. I'm also aware of the second bug where the main area is shorter than the window height but the menu generates a scroll. That bug totally depends on the window height. But I'm working on that one right now. The compatibility stuff is taken straight from the current Pike site. There really are some old stuff all over the place so much of the content would need a look over. The DNS client probably wasn't 100% back when that compatibility table was made ;D Thanks for the feedback :) Skickat i rörligt läge >> 19 apr. 2016 kl. 08:17 skrev Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com>: >> >> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 4:02 AM, Pontus Östlund <pon...@roxen.com> wrote: >> Module refdoc: >> http://poppa.github.io/pikedoc/ >> >> So feel free to comment and give feedback. > > This is the same refdoc layout that's being built from current trunk > Pike, right? I've been using it for a while now; for the most part > it's pretty good, but there are a couple of glitches. One that I > haven't yet tracked down is that sometimes the left panel doesn't > fully load - you have the top info, but it looks like the module/class > is empty. Reloading the page usually fixes it (if not, keep trying > till it does). > > There's also a small issue with scrolling, in the situation where the > left panel goes beyond the screen size and the right panel (the main > info) doesn't. For example, some of the GTK classes have a lot of > methods, but not much description: > > http://poppa.github.io/pikedoc/ex/predef_3A_3A/GTK2/Clipboard.html > > Attempting to scroll the left panel is tricky. It can be done, but I'm > not sure what causes it to suddenly "unlock". > > It's probably a data issue rather than the web site, but I noticed in > your demo of compatibility tables that Pike has full DNS server > support, but is listed as only "partial" client. What's incomplete > there? > > For the most part, looking good! > > ChrisA
