Hey,
>> My personal taste would go for a light page header (like a revamped current >> white/blue) rather than a dark one. I find the pike fish hardly recognizable >> light on dark. > > I think the fish has more to do with size than with color. I’ll see if I can > tune that a little bit. OK, you're the artist. >>> Module refdoc: >>> http://poppa.github.io/pikedoc/ <http://poppa.github.io/pikedoc/> >>> >>> So feel free to comment and give feedback. Oh, and since there are some >>> really, really, really, really, really, really old content on the site we >>> need to clean up some old stuff that’s no longer viable. I’ve already done >>> some of that on my local copy, but I’ll put together a list of stuff we >>> need to look into. But lets take that later... >> >> >> A good new feature would be to allow user contributed notes in the refdoc. >> >> That's double-edged sword, but that's the main drawback programmers i'd want >> to code in Pike opposed me. PHP user contributed notes for example could >> look sometimes lousy, but they give real-word examples to figure how to use >> modules. Sometimes, the refdoc look somewhat too much abstract to newcomers. > > Indeed, I agree! PHP was where I started and the user contributions in the > PHP doc was priceless. We could solve that with Disqus (https://disqus.com/ > <https://disqus.com/>). Just jack in some JS when the refdoc is being run on > pike.lysator.liu.se <http://pike.lysator.liu.se/>. I’ve already done that > with Google Custom Search: Sounds good ! -- Bertrand LUPART